Plain Label Cigarette Packaging….. Well plain if you don’t count the images of dead people and diseased limbs plastered all over them.

Okay yes, I confess, I am a smoker.

And yes I know it’s one of the stupidest, most self-destructive things that a person could possibly do for their health …….

And yes I know that cigarette smoking is, now or less these days , being portrayed as the one and only form of self-induced harm that causes our health care system millions of dollars…….

And as a response to this the government have introduced new laws mandating the use of plain label packaging for cigarettes in the hopes that people,  who can no longer buy ‘their brand’ of cigarette,  will quit……..

Yeah right…. Like that’s going to happen!!!!

So to further impress upon us that smoking is currently the greatest evil in our society, these so-called “plain labelled packages” also come complete with graphic, and I do mean graphic, images of diseased lungs, limbs, eyes, pre-term babies, and  even pictures of dead people, just to show us how stupid we all are for smoking.

Now I don’t mind the idea of ‘plain label packaging’ for cigarettes, but what I do mind is being forced to purchase a product with such horrible imagery on it. In fact, I mind it very much and I hate that my children are also being exposed to the graphic imagery on the packaging.

So I ask you, what’s “plain label” about forcing purchasers to have to view such graphic and disturbing imagery simply in order to buy a product that our government seems so reluctant to withdraw from sale yet at the same time is so keen to keep sucking  the tax dollars from?

If smoking is really that big of a blight on our health care system, then why don’t our governments simply shut the cigarette manufacturing companies down or make it illegal to purchase, sell or consume cigarettes?

Furthermore, if you’re going to mandate plain label restrictions on legal drugs like tobacco, then why not do the same for alcohol, which provides just as big, if not bigger headaches not just for our health system but also for our police force?

Why doesn’t a bottle of Whiskey have to come complete with pictures of cirrhosis of the liver, cars wrapped around trees, cemeteries, or graphic depictions of the loss of limbs caused through drink driving accidents?

Tobacco isn’t the only drug that has a habit of killing the people who consume it.

Though it seems to me that we are all of sudden being expected to believe that this is so,

And that drinking copious amounts of alcohol is an innocent past time with absolutely no broader health consequences at all for  our wider society, our health system, our court system  or the individual drinkers  and their families who become caught up in a web of drug abuse far more insidious than cigarette smoking could ever be.

Yet, if drinking is so innocent a past time, then why do we have entire sections of our police force dedicated to catching “drink drivers”, providing “booze buses”  or spending hour after hour patrolling night clubs and the streets around them for those who are committing acts of drunken violence?

When was the last time you heard of a person causing a fatal car crash because they’d had too many cigarettes before they got behind the wheel of a car?

When was the last time you heard of someone starting a brawl in a public place because they’d smoked too many cigarettes, too quickly?

When was the last time you heard of the police being called to attend a domestic violence scene because a man had too many cigarettes, lost control and stated beating up his wife and children?

These are all situations that our police force and indeed our ambulance and health care workers are being forced to deal with because of the use and abuse of alcohol.

Yet alcohol manufactures and consumers are not being forced to endure the horribly graphic imagery that is now adorning cigarette packaging.

So shouldn’t we be asking why this is so?

As far as I’ m concerned alcohol abuse poses a much greater and immediate threat to our youth than cigarette smoking ever will.

Yet it’s cigarette smoking that our governments have chosen to come down hardest upon, whilst allowing the alcohol industry to continue it’s free reign over our society.

Does anyone else view the way our governments are dealing with the scourge of tobacco whilst ignoring the multiple costs of alcohol abuse as a double standard the way that I do?

15 thoughts on “Plain Label Cigarette Packaging….. Well plain if you don’t count the images of dead people and diseased limbs plastered all over them.

  1. I sometimes wish that smoking would become illegal or something that would stop them from being available. I live in Kentucky where aside from the coal mining industry, our state needs the smokers so that we can have much needed revenue. I understand the habit and need to smoke as I smoked for nearly 20 years before quitting a year ago. These images, which I wasn’t aware of, are one of the stupidest ideas to try and stop smoking. I agree, children shouldn’t see this stuff. But the sad thing is, those images will probably cause more teenagers to want to smoke.
    AS I said, It would be a seemingly easy solution to just make them illegal, and stop production. But I would be surprised if it took away the problem. Here in this old fashion neck of the woods, if you need a cigarette all you have to do is grow a little tobacco lol. It is no different with Pot here.
    I think that smoking is more of a mental addiction. The only real way to quit is by making a decision and sticking to it. Same as with with weight loss. It takes a made up mind and convincing oneself that the habit is really not worth the price, the smell, and of course, what it is doing with your body.
    I havent’ seen these boxes of Cigarettes with images here yet. I hope someone comes up wit ha better Idea before it gets here lol.

  2. I totally agree. I managed to give up smoking in September 2011 and it had absolutely nothing to do with those pictures. I just ignored them. The way smokers are made the scapegoat makes me really cross. They will probably never ban cigarettes completely because the tax they make on them is far too high. Even here in the UK the tax they make on cigarettes far outweighs the amount spent on treating smoking related illnesses on the NHS.
    I know you can buy cases to transfer your ciggies into but the selection should soon get much better and you won’t have to look at those revolting pictures. It’s a golden business opportunity for those taking notice. You can also buy fun stickers to cover them up.
    Governments are a joke. They don’t WANT people to stop smoking but they have to be seen to disapprove. Ridiculous.

  3. I get a lump in my throat (sorry!) whenever this subject comes up. Those wonderful people who rule us are so concerned for us that they are prepared to take the tax, but not to ban the product. They complain at the cost to the health service on one hand, and finance it by taxing tobacco with the other.

    If smoking is so dangerous it should be illegal. And it would be, if we didn’t make so much from exporting cigarettes.

    As for the images? Well, let’s hear it for obesity (we do, after all, hear about it – incessantly). Suppose all MacDonalds wrappers were to be embellished with pictures of human flab, or bad teeth?

    All depends who you are, doesn’t it?

    • You are so right frederick anderson. Could you imagine the out cry if they started plastering images of dead cows on Macca’s wrappers or worse still, forced the cosmetics industry to put pictures of lab rats and rabbits on boxes of cosmetics……?

  4. I live in Canada and they do include some of those images you suggested on the alcohol, except it’s not on the bottle but the bag. They are good about making drunk driving a shameful thing here too so I like that. What country are you in?

  5. The images don’t bother me but I completely agree with you about alcohol. When I’m out, I’m not worried about breathing in smoke from others, I’m more worried about the idiots who decide to drink too much and get violent. I too am a smoker so that’s probably why breathing in smoke doesn’t bother me but all this stuff the government is doing is a complete waste of time and money. If smoking wasn’t such a revenue maker, they would ban it but they need something from smokers and that’s why they won’t make it illegal.

    • Totally agree with you Miss V. A lot of people’s nights out are ruined more by the actions of drunk people than they are by the actions of smokers, who are now usually pushed out into the cold and away from others to smoke.

  6. It seems to me this is more about a loathesome impulse to tell people what to do. It does not stem from a concern for the well-being of smokers. Instead it seems to spring from a newly created, pseudo-moral code. The packaging is designed to shame and further ostracize smokers while still fleecing them for as much money as possible through ridiculous taxes.

Share with me......

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s