“Sneaky words, said with a smile,
While holding a piece of chalk,
To draw the dividing line,
Made by words,
Sounding alright on the surface,
But laden with,
And sometimes Not Quite Human
We are the people you call
- Low Functioning
- High Functioning
You say we are in need of a
- Peer Buddy
- Peer Pal
- Good Friend from Mrs. Jones Program
We are the
- Inclusion Student
- The community service hours other kids need
- At the Peer Buddies lunch table
- The Special Ed table in the Inclusion Room
- On the Special Ed bench waiting for our short bus
During the school day you will find us in the
- Inclusion Room (when it is our turn because they can only take one of us at a time)
- Cognitively Delayed Room
- Behavior Room
- Emotionally Disturbed Room
- EBD Room (Emotionally Behaviorally Disturbed)
- Special Ed Room
- Special Needs Room
We are so doggone “special” that after school we attend
- Special Olympics
- Special Arts
- Special Night at the YMCA
- Special Needs Social Group
Where every participant is just as special
And those who are not special are our helpers
When we grow up we live in
- Special Housing
- Some of us in Section 8 rentals
- Some in group homes
- Some in county care facilities
- Some of us are so special that there isn’t even a special enough place for us so we stay living with our parents.
- Some of us are not quite special enough to get on a housing list and yet cannot maintain on our own so we stay living with our parents.
As adults too many of us spend our days
- In Special Programs (if our county has them)
- At ARC (if our town has an ARC)
- At Sheltered Workshops (if one is available)
- In Supported Employment (if we qualify)
- Looking for a job (on the days we are able to)
- On the couch in our parent’s home (because other options are not available)
Because we are so deficient
In ever so many ways
Whenever we do something ordinary
like zip up our jacket, ride a horse, or answer Jeopardy questions you describe us as
- An Inspiration
I don’t understand this. If my friends and I are such awesome inspirations to the rest of you
- Why is it that we are in two distinct groups – US and THEM?
- Why is it that your group always holds the chalk?
- Why do you keep using your chalk to draw lines that divide us?
- Why do you want me on the other side of your line – away from you?
- And why do you think this is good?”
By Judy Endow
This is just an abstract from her amazing poem, “Chalk word lines of separation”, I encourage you to read it in its entirety on her blog site at http://www.judyendow.com/advocacy/chalk-word-lines-of-separation/
Two Tasmanian men, Adam Maxwell Cox, 34 and Mark Paul Phillips, 25, have been charged with committing several counts of aggravated sexual assault on an intellectually disabled man.
The sexual assaults were described by the Tasmanian Police as being “particularly serious and particularly nasty” assaults that took place over the course of several days.
With the first round of sexual assaults lasting for a period of eight hours.
The second over a period of 17 hours.
According to court documents, the nature of these aggravated attacks included, but were not limited to;
” sexually assaulting him by penetrating his rectum with a broom handle and a glass beer bottle.”
“Assault by setting fire to the man’s body using flammable liquid and tying him to a punching bag.”
“Assaulting the man by tying him to a pole for several hours and hitting him with a baseball bat, machete and fists”.
“Loading a double-barrel shotgun to his leg while he was tied to a pole.”
As a result of these attacks, the victim suffered severe internal injuries, particularly to his bowel, which required immediate surgery and will no doubt cause him significant ongoing health problems for the rest of his life.
Despite the heinous nature of the charges against them, both Cox and Phillips refused to enter a plea and were released on bail pending a future court date.
Given the vileness of the crimes that both Cox and Phillips have been charged with perpetrating against this trusting and vulnerable, disabled man, and the undeniable nature of his injuries, one has to wonder why it is, that although they were both charged with aggravated sexual assault, which to my mind should also include, “occasioning grievous bodily harm”, they were both released on bail and allowed to walk freely back into society.
Why are men like these, who have been charged by the police with committing such unforgivable and life altering acts, effectively being allowed to buy themselves a temporary reprieve from jail?
And why are we as a society constantly being expected to put up with the knowledge that the likes of such men are walking around our cities and towns, doing God knows what, to God knows who, just because the justice system needs time to set all of its wheels in motion?
Clearly whatever the bail limit was set at, it wasn’t high enough to prevent either of these perverts from being able to pay their way out of jail.
In instances such as these, one has to question why they were even given the option of bail in the first place.
Clearly the police found enough evidence to arrest and charge them with the crime, so why let them go?
On a more profoundly disturbing level, it also makes me wonder whether or not the fact that the victim was a disabled man and not (heaven forbid) a child or a woman, had anything to do with the rational for offering up bail as an option at all.
Were these maggots somehow viewed as being less of a threat to the community specifically because they had targeted a disabled man and not a woman or a child?
If that was the rational behind furnishing them with the option for bail, then it should be viewed as being an extremely flawed and precarious, one indeed.
For who among us in society could possibly be more vulnerable than the profoundly intellectually disabled?
Cases like this really make me question just how effective our so-called justice system can be seen to operate in either its role of metering out justice or protecting any of us from those who are known to cause harm.
Let alone protecting those who are already the most vulnerable within our society.
“A feature of Asperger’s syndrome that can be advantageous to society is a concern with social justice and discrimination against minority groups.
This can sometimes be strikingly developed in Asperger’s cases, often because of their characteristic impatience with conventional hypocrisy and publicly accepted double standards (not to mention the fact that they sometimes feel the victims of discrimination themselves).
Modern societies have canonized such concerns in law and public attitudes, and a number of famous campaigners for equal rights and social justice have been posthumously proposed as Asperger’s cases.
Autistics tend to be loners, who are poor at participating in group activities of the kind that exploit social justice and anti-discrimination sentiment for self-serving political and social advantage.
Modern authorities on autism have described autistics as “truth-tellers” and, thanks to their bottom-up, devil-in-the-detail style of cognition, are often the first to see that the emperor has no clothes or that the great idol has feet of clay.
Furthermore, they are also likely to be the ones to blurt out the truth, and draw attention to the inconvenient fact, irrespective of what others may think.
I do believe that autistic antagonism to lies and deception of all kinds is not only the most redeeming feature of the so-called disorder, but one which autism shares increasingly with modern societies—and very much to their benefit.” Original Article by Christopher Badcock http://www.psychologytoday.com/blog/the-imprinted-brain/201006/the-big-plus-the-outsider-society-truth-challenges-lies
I have often wondered whether or not the world would be a much better, fairer place, if it were being run by people who felt a burning need for social justice… aka…Aspies.
The above abstract is from a much larger article by Christopher Badcock which makes some strikingly good points regarding the ways in which the strengths of those with Asperger’s could be put to good use within our societies.
So what do you think?
Have your say on whether or not you think the world be a better, fairer place if it were being run by Aspies in the comment section below.
“I am not “lazy” because I can’t function emotionally or mentally in the general work force.
I am not “weak” because I have a hard time processing emotions and am easily overwhelmed by the emotions of others.
“I am not a “recluse” because I prefer to stay at home where I feel most in control and safe.
I am not “anti-social” because I cannot handle large public gatherings and can only handle one or two friends at a time.”
I am not “stupid” because I cannot understand some math concepts and have a hard time with my handwriting and communicating verbally at times.
I am not what you want or need me to be
I am Autistic and I don’t have to apologize for that to anyone.”
These powerful words by http://lennemi.wordpress.com represent the way many with Autism feel about the overwhelming expectations placed on them by a society that refuses to accept them for who they are and instead replaces understanding with often cruel and ignorant judgements.
lennemi’s words have been reproduced on this blog with the full permission of the author.
They are part of a brilliant post which I urge you to find here http://lennemi.wordpress.com/2014/07/02/autistic-what-i-am-not/
I’ve lost count of the number of people I’ve known who are still claiming the DSP for conditions that they no longer have. I grew up with an uncle who, from the age of 30, was on a DSP for a temporary back injury that cleared up over time. Yet even though the injury no longer affected him, (in fact, he used to cut and sell firewood on the side), he still collected his DSP every fortnight. And to the best of my knowledge, all these years later, is still doing so.
Even closer to home the woman down the road, in her 40’s has been on DSP for the last 7 or so years, similarly for a back injury, and yet she can push a lawn mower, work from dusk til dawn in her garden, lug groceries and great armfuls of firewood in winter. Now I’m not saying that she doesn’t suffer pain at times, because she may well do, but what I am saying is, that if she can do all of those things, then she, like my uncle, clearly suffers no permanent disability.
My son, on the other hand,who has several genuine and life long health conditions ( including Autism), which are considered to be permanent disabilities, has to jump through umpteen hoops just to try and qualify for that which I routinely see others receiving for no reason other than the fact that nobody has bothered to check to see if the initial condition, which qualified them for the DSP in the first place, is still preventing them from working years later.
So I’m all for reviewing and changing the DSP if it means that those, who once may have genuinely required those payments, but no longer do, end up being reassessed for the legitimacy of their payments.
I’m all for supporting people in genuine need and for genuine reasons, but in reality, claiming a Disability Support Payment when you do not indeed have a disabling condition, is FRAUD and it should be acknowledged as being so.
This is the question posed in a 60 minute piece of propaganda documentary by JW Productions that attempts to persuade it’s viewers that an adult male’s level of increased sexual attraction toward much younger females, is an evolutionary and therefore natural process that all adult males experience.
This documentary states, that from an evolutionary perspective, it has been preferable for older males to find much younger females (teens and tweens) sexually attractive because their appearances indicate to men, that on some primal level ,that young and developing girls are at their prime breeding age.
Hence forth the older male should be excused for having lustful thoughts and feelings towards teenage girls as they are only obeying their primal instincts by doing so.
The makers of this documentary then take this particular line of rational despicably one step further by making the claim that it’s also a natural evolutionary and biological process for younger females (teens and tweens) to deliberately seek out and desire the sexual attention of older males.
As evidence of this they cite the rising levels of young girls taking naked or sexually suggestive “selfies” and sending them to boys or posting them online to garner male attention.
They then state that across globe “there is no standard definition for pedophilia because the world cannot agree on the legal definition of the age of consent. The legal age at which a heterosexual person is considered legal for sexual acts varies from nine years to twenty years.”
Due to the lack of legal agreement as to the age of consent, the presumption is them made that the age at which one is considered to be an adult, in western countries, is an arbitrary one that is based more on the needs of our economic and educational systems, than it is based on a young person’s actual levels of physical and mental maturity.
Thus, because girls mature physically faster than males of their own age, they are also presumed to mature mentally and sexually faster as well.
So fast in fact that under age girls are (supposedly) routinely seeking out and willingly engaging in sexual encounters with much older men.
Given that the film makers have already argued that the age at which one becomes viewed as an adult is an ineffective and economically arbitrary one, the sick argument then follows that, if a girl is physically developed, regardless of her biological age, she should also be considered mentally mature enough to legally have sex.
In other words, if her breasts are developing and she’s begun menstruating, then a girl should effectively be considered an adult who is fair game able to engage in sex with older men.
In a further attempt to normalize pedophilia the documentary makers repeatedly make the assertion that the sexual actions that we consider to be acts of pedophilia are instead acts of Hebophilia which is defined as the state of adults being sexually attracted to adolescent children.
In this case an adolescent is described as a child between the ages of 12 to 16 years of age.
As opposed to pedophilia which is defined as an attraction to pre-pubescent children (12 years or younger)
Hebophilia, they argue, should be seen as something that is perfectly normal as it serves an evolutionary purpose and therefore should be accepted and if not legalized, then understood by society to be a lesser crime than that of pedophilia.
In order to further bolster this claim they then introduce the few cases of hebophilia around the world that have involved older women, usually teachers, engaging in consensual sexual acts with teenage males.
As if this fact somehow creates a level of predatory equality.
At no point within this documentary do they make the point that the vast majority of hebophilia is committed by males and that acts of pedophilia, sexual acts committed against children under the age of 12, are exclusively committed by males.
Only once do they mention the sea of damage and devastation caused to the many victims of pedophilia who are by no means willing participants in the process of their sexual abuse.
They do their best to make it sound as if all acts of hebophilia between younger women and older males are consensual acts, when in point of fact, statistically they are not.
Only once in this documentary is the word ‘rape’ mentioned and even then it’s only as a sound bite within a broader conversation.
They also fail to address the incredibly wide age range wherein acts of hebophilia, the kind of pedophilia that they say is okay and should be made forgivable, occur.
It’s one thing to claim that a 16-year-old gave her consent to engaging in a sexual encounter with an older male but another thing entirely to try and make that same claim regarding a 13-year-old child.
On the whole I’d have to say that this documentary sickened me to my very core and left me even more concerned for a world that could produce a documentary that seeks to promote and defend pedophilia / hebophilia in such way.
As much as I despised the messages contained within this documentary I think it’s worth making others aware of the kind of illogical bias and propaganda that those who are willing to defend pedophilia are spouting.